Course evaluations
This page presents formal evaluation data from my teaching across universities, summer schools, and professional short courses, alongside participant feedback from invited workshops. Where an institution did not collect or release evaluations, that is noted rather than omitted.
Monash University (2026)
I co-taught Political Theory in a Changing World: Concepts, Issues and Debates (ATS1071) in Semester 1, 2026, leading three tutorial sections. SETU scores are reported on a 0–100 scale, against the faculty average for the same period.
| Measure | Crabtree | Faculty average | Detail |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student experience of teaching | 98/100 | 88/100 | View |
| Share rating teaching “Very High” | 95.0% | 66.5% | View |
Forty students completed the end-of-semester SETU survey across the three sections, roughly a 44% response rate; 41 completed a separate mid-semester survey in Week 7. The quotes below come from both.
Charles was an incredibly effective teacher. His passion for political science was obvious and he showed a deep care for all his students. He made our class a safe space and contributed to making a small community which helped us learn together.
My lecturer Charles C was super helpful throughout the unit; the concepts were explained with such clarity and coherency. The assessment enquiry session was also very helpful in terms of individualised feedback … they were very approachable and I received all the guidance I needed.
Charles’ approach is very helpful and motivating; he’s open, passionate, and kind. That makes attendance feel more like a fun discussion rather than a university class.
The tutorial is very engaging … discussion is always interesting and fun. I’m not scared to participate.
Dartmouth College (2020–2025)
At Dartmouth, scores closer to 1 indicate better evaluations; scores below have been reverse-coded for interpretability.
| Course | Term | Course Quality | Teaching Effectiveness | Syllabus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Honors Research in Government | Fall 2025 | Not collected | Not collected | View |
| Honors Research in Government | Fall 2024 | 4.75/5 | 4.86/5 | View |
| Baltic Politics | Summer 2024 | Not collected by Dartmouth | Not collected by Dartmouth | View |
| Baltic Politics | Summer 2023 | Not collected by Dartmouth | Not collected by Dartmouth | View |
| Quantitative Political Analysis | Winter 2023 | 4.67/5 | 4.75/5 | View |
| Experiments in Politics | Winter 2023 | 4.54/5 | 4.75/5 | View |
| Quantitative Political Analysis | Fall 2022 | 4.41/5 | 4.77/5 | View |
| Experiments in Politics | Fall 2022 | 4.71/5 | 4.67/5 | View |
| Quantitative Political Analysis | Winter 2021 | 5/5 | 5/5 | View |
| Experiments in Politics | Winter 2021 | 4.82/5 | 4.91/5 | View |
| Quantitative Political Analysis | Spring 2021 | 4.54/5 | 4.75/5 | View |
Across eight evaluated offerings, mean teaching effectiveness was 4.81 and mean course quality 4.68. What students wrote:
Professor Crabtree was the best professor I’ve had at Dartmouth. He was down to earth, helpful, and genuinely cared about his students. He met with my research group multiple times throughout the term, even when he was very busy … his lectures were engaging and he made me want to learn more.
This was a fantastic class! It’s hard to shout out specific things that were most effective, because the entire class was very effective … really well structured, with group problem sets, individual readings, and our research project, which was a great way to apply our learning to an interesting, real-world topic.
I’ve nothing but the absolute best things to say about Charles Crabtree. One of my favorite professors I’ve had on this campus, and made class so fun while also challenging.
He is incredibly supportive, explains statistical concepts very well, and is excellent at demonstrating why statistical analysis matters to a group of people who were mostly only in the class to fulfil a prerequisite … I never expected to have a good time in this class, but it ended up being pretty enjoyable and I learned a lot.
Prof. Crabtree is one of the most empathetic professors I’ve ever met, and this makes him a great teacher who prioritizes students’ growth.
The professor is one of the kindest, most understanding people, and as such engagement in the class was incredibly high. We were able to think of great ideas and felt supported in the environment.
Professor Crabtree is very engaging and energetic. He is very supportive and makes himself frequently accessible to students. He is a kind person and wants to make a positive impact.
Professor Crabtree is by far the best professor I’ve had at Dartmouth.
University of Virginia School of Law (2020)
I co-taught two J-term courses on Computational Text Analysis for Legal Practice with Kevin Cope. These intensive January-term courses introduced law students to computational methods for analyzing legal documents, court opinions, and other text data, with hands-on applications to legal research and practice.
| Course | Year | Overall Quality | Syllabus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Computational Text Analysis for Legal Practice | 2020 | 4.97/5 | View |
Northwestern University (2012–2013)
As a graduate student, I served as Teaching Assistant for The Global City in Northwestern's Master of Public Policy and Administration program across three terms (Winter 2012, Winter 2013, Summer 2013).
Short courses (2026)
Across four short courses taught for AI Horizons and Statistical Horizons in 2026 — Using AI to Build Better Experiments, AI Agent-Driven Research Workflows, and AI Agents for Teaching — 30 of 46 participants rated the course Excellent, the top category on the scale.
This was an excellent introduction to AI agents that provided us with practical skills that we can implement immediately in our research. One of the best courses I’ve ever taken!
I enjoyed the committed lecturer, lively participants, friendly interactions, and helpful live demos on how to actually use the AI applications.
I loved getting lots of new ideas for how AI can support my teaching. I appreciated learning more about AI agents and Claude Code. I also appreciated the instructor’s willingness to engage with student questions and to produce additional content for us.
The topics covered were appropriate and relevant, and the delivery pace was excellent. Hands-on practice in class was an excellent idea. The instructor was very knowledgeable and helpful: they offered office hours in addition to class time, provided useful supplementary materials, and promised to create and share extra videos on topics not covered during class.
The course material and hands-on examples were carefully curated, and the lecturer is very generous in sharing his own example files. Dr. Crabtree was very responsive to participants’ questions and elaborated on all sorts of detailed aspects about what integrates how in which way (or not…). I walked away with one of my own existing assignments “analyzed for AI by AI”, identifying the grading aspects that still work in times of AI-use by students, and those that need to be reworked.
Charles was a wonderful and thoughtful instructor who adapted to the needs of the class. I was very impressed.
Useful information that is directly applicable to my work. I greatly appreciate the slides and how they are available to me with embedded links to all the resources that I would need to use what I learned. Charles was a fantastic instructor, and I wish we got to spend more time learning from him!
Summer schools
| Programme | Year | Evaluations |
|---|---|---|
| Essex Summer School in Social Science Data Analysis | 2026 | Collected and shared with instructors |
| Essex Summer School in Social Science Data Analysis | 2025 | Not collected by Essex |
| IPSA–NUS Methods School | 2025 | Not provided |
Invited workshops (2020–2023)
Participants in invited methods workshops were surveyed independently. The survey drew 36 responses — 15 master’s students, 10 faculty, 10 doctoral students, and 1 undergraduate — from workshops at Waseda, Kobe, Keio, Yonsei, Doshisha, City University of Hong Kong, and V–Dem.
| Measure | Result |
|---|---|
| More or much more helpful than comparable workshops | 29 of 36 |
| — of which much more helpful | 19 |
| Organized or very organized | 34 of 36 |
| Teaching materials useful or very useful | 36 of 36 |
The workshop was very organized in step-by-step allowing even beginners to follow the materials. Also, the group exercise part was fun and made students to concentrate. Master’s student, Yonsei University
I find the practical approach of the workshop is particularly useful and makes it better than other courses that I have attended before. The experience of working on a project that uses text analysis and the coding sessions serve as models for me in future projects. Ph.D. student, Waseda University
The professor led us to actually complete a project, from the initial idea to the final submission, and we as postgraduates had the opportunity to understand a whole process of research, which was a very valuable experience. Master’s student, Waseda University